# The role of frictional plasticity in the evolution of normal fault systems

- **Authors:** David E. Dempsey; Susan M. Ellis; Julie V. Rowland; Rosalind A. Archer
- **Journal:** Journal of Structural Geology, vol. 39, pp. 122-137 (2012)
- **Publisher:** Elsevier BV
- **DOI (version of record):** [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2012.03.001](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2012.03.001)
- **This page:** https://ddempsey.github.io/papers/2012-dempsey-role-frictional-plasticity-evolution-normal/
- **Open PDF:** [https://ddempsey.github.io/papers/2012-dempsey-role-frictional-plasticity-evolution-normal/dempsey2012-role-frictional-plasticity.pdf](https://ddempsey.github.io/papers/2012-dempsey-role-frictional-plasticity-evolution-normal/dempsey2012-role-frictional-plasticity.pdf) (Accepted manuscript (peer-reviewed, author's version))
- **Full text (Markdown):** [https://ddempsey.github.io/papers/2012-dempsey-role-frictional-plasticity-evolution-normal/fulltext.md](https://ddempsey.github.io/papers/2012-dempsey-role-frictional-plasticity-evolution-normal/fulltext.md)
- **Notice:** Accepted manuscript. © 2012. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. The version of record is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2012.03.001
- **Explainer:** all explainers on this site are AI-generated.
- **BibTeX:** https://ddempsey.github.io/papers/2012-dempsey-role-frictional-plasticity-evolution-normal/citation.bib
- **Topics:** Induced seismicity & faults
- **Keywords:** Geology; Crust; Seismology; Shearing (physics); Fault (geology); Shear (geology); Tectonics; Slip (aerodynamics)

## In brief

We modelled a single normal fault in a stretching crust. In our model the fault takes up about half of the stretching of the upper crust. Slow frictional shearing takes up the rest, mostly in the hanging wall, where we suggest new faults are favoured to form.

- In our model, a fault dipping at 50° takes up about half of the upper-crust extension over a 220-year earthquake cycle. Distributed frictional shearing takes up the rest.
- Repeated earthquakes hold the crust next to the fault up to 10 MPa below failure. This stress shadow extends further into the footwall than into the hanging wall.
- Shear bands dipping at about 45° form in the hanging wall, outside the stress shadow, and dip the same way as the main fault. We suggest they can be regarded as proto-faults if they lengthen each time they slip.
- The modelled fault rotates to a shallower dip at about 23.5° per million years, split almost equally between the periods between earthquakes and the earthquakes themselves.
- Our results are consistent with faulting migrating into the hanging walls of older faults, as described for the western Gulf of Corinth, Greece.

## The problem

Where the crust is stretched, it breaks along normal faults. In each earthquake
the hanging wall, the block above the fault, drops relative to the footwall
below it. New faults keep forming as a rift grows (Jackson and McKenzie, 1983).
Field studies indicate that slip summed across the known faults of a rift does
not always account for the stretching rate measured by geodetic surveys
(Villamor and Berryman, 2001; Wallace et al., 2004). Other deformation, or
faults not yet found, must take up the shortfall.

The western Gulf of Corinth in Greece is stretching at 12 to 14 millimetres
(mm) per year (Clarke et al., 1997; Briole et al., 2000; Floyd et al., 2010).
There, new faults have formed in the hanging walls of older ones (Jackson,
1999; Goldsworthy and Jackson, 2001). Our goal was to find how frictional
plasticity contributes to this evolution. Frictional plasticity is permanent
deformation of the crust by sliding on many small fractures. We treat it as a
possible precursor to a new fault.

## What we did

We built a two-dimensional finite element model of a slice of crust 60 km wide
and 25 km deep, with its sides pulled apart at a combined 12 mm per year. The
model rock deforms elastically until it reaches its failure limit, and then by
frictional plasticity. In the hotter lower crust it creeps slowly.

The crust contains one fault, dipping at 50° to a depth of 15 km. We locked the
fault for 220 years and then lowered its friction coefficient to 0.2 for 60
seconds to represent an earthquake. We tallied the split of the applied
extension between fault slip, elastic strain, frictional plasticity and creep,
the extension budget.

## What we found

In the upper 5 km, over a 220-year cycle, the 50° fault takes up about half of
the extension and frictional plasticity takes up the rest.

In our model, repeated earthquakes on a low-friction fault keep the crust next
to it up to 10 MPa (megapascals, a unit of stress) below its failure limit. We
call this region a stress shadow. The shadow is widest near the surface and
extends further into the footwall. This is because the footwall moves up and
away from the fault in each earthquake, while the model sides move by a
negligible amount during the 60-second slip. The shallow footwall is therefore
compressed horizontally. This compression lowers the stress there further below
the failure limit.

Frictional plasticity is concentrated in bands about 1 km wide that dip at
about 45°. Most form in the hanging wall outside the shadow, dipping the same
way as the main fault. These bands take up dip-slip in narrow zones. If they
lengthen each time they slip, they can be regarded as proto-faults. Whether
they become faults is speculative. Their modelled strain rate is equivalent to
a slip rate on the order of 0.15 mm per year, about one eightieth of the rate
at which the model is stretched.

The fault also rotates to a shallower dip. Between earthquakes, vertical
thinning of the stretching crust flattens the fault. During an earthquake, the
rotation may come from the footwall at 6 to 9 km depth expanding as its stress
drops, pushing on the hanging wall. Together, in almost equal parts, the two
periods rotate the fault at about 23.5° per million years. We expect this rate
to slow as the fault rotates out of the range in which it can slip.

<div class="widget" id="w-fault-clock" role="group" aria-label="Illustrative extrapolation of fault dip and proto-fault offset after a chosen time, from the model's rotation and slip rates"></div>

If both rates stayed constant, after 100,000 years the fault would have rotated
from 50° to roughly 48°, and a proto-fault would have an offset on the order of
15 m. These illustrative figures are not in the paper.

We suggest that a young fault takes up only part of the extension, and that
proto-faults grow in its hanging wall to take up the rest. Older faults may
eventually rotate too far to slip. The shortfall would then grow and new
proto-faults would form. Our model is consistent with faulting migrating into
the hanging walls of existing faults, as in the western Gulf of Corinth.

If we take the edge of the shadow as the 1 MPa contour, the model suggests a
minimum spacing of about 2 km between hanging-wall faults. This is slightly
smaller than the 5 to 8 km average in the Gulf (Rohais et al., 2007). However,
direct comparison with field studies is not possible, because the size of the
shadow depends on the thickness of the brittle crust and on fault dip. The
brittle crust there is 10 to 12 km thick (Briole et al., 2000), against 6 to 8
km in our model. We would expect a thicker brittle crust to give larger shadows
and wider spacings.

## Limitations

The model is a single two-dimensional slice through one fault. The fault is
switched between locked and slipping at prescribed times. The model therefore
cannot address how earthquakes start. It leaves out the weakening of rock as it
deforms (strain softening). As a result the width of the shear bands depends on
the size of the model elements. We offer the sequence above as an illustration
of processes that may operate in specific places such as the western Gulf of
Corinth. Faulting cannot migrate into hanging walls indefinitely unless the
zone of extension moves too. Where the zone of extension is stationary, the
stress shadow around inactive faults may recover and allow faulting to return
to older footwalls.

## Glossary

A **normal fault** is a fault where the crust is being stretched and the upper
block slides down the fault plane.

The **hanging wall** is the block of crust above a dipping fault, and the
**footwall** is the block below it.

A fault **dips** at the angle it is inclined below horizontal. **Dip-slip** is
movement up or down the slope of a fault.

A **geodetic survey** repeatedly measures the position of points on the ground.

**Frictional plasticity** is permanent deformation of rock by sliding on many
small fractures.

A **proto-fault** is a band of concentrated shearing that may develop into a
new fault.

A **stress shadow** is a region near a fault where repeated earthquakes keep
the stress below the failure limit.

The **extension budget** is the split of the applied stretching between fault
slip, elastic strain, frictional plasticity and creep.

**Elastic strain** is stretching or squeezing of rock that is reversed when the
stress is removed.

The **failure limit** is the stress at which rock starts to slide on its
fractures.

**Creep** is slow, continuous flow of hot rock at depth.

**Strain softening** is the weakening of rock as it deforms.

A **finite element model** solves the equations of deformation by dividing the
crust into many small elements, here about 10,000.

A **friction coefficient** is the ratio of the force needed to slide a fault to
the force pressing it shut.

A **megapascal (MPa)** is a unit of stress, one million newtons per square
metre.

## Cite

Dempsey, David E., Ellis, Susan M., Rowland, Julie V., Archer, Rosalind A. (2012). The role of frictional plasticity in the evolution of normal fault systems. Journal of Structural Geology, 39, 122-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2012.03.001

```bibtex
@article{dempsey2012role,
  title = {The role of frictional plasticity in the evolution of normal fault systems},
  author = {Dempsey, David E. and Ellis, Susan M. and Rowland, Julie V. and Archer, Rosalind A.},
  journal = {Journal of Structural Geology},
  year = {2012},
  volume = {39},
  pages = {122-137},
  publisher = {Elsevier BV},
  doi = {10.1016/j.jsg.2012.03.001},
  url = {https://ddempsey.github.io/papers/2012-dempsey-role-frictional-plasticity-evolution-normal/}
}
```